Presentation about
Machiavelli
I will confess, I like
Machiavelli. He has the distinct advantage of having actually practised what he
preaches, which helps in the credibility stakes. Having served the Florentine
Republic as a diplomat, Machiavelli knew firsthand what a messy business
politics and governance is. There is a distinct absence of ideals and utopia’s
in The Prince.
He also is clearly
educated and able to think for himself. “The Prince” is a manual for rulers and
want-to-be rulers. It is wonderfully pragmatic. It is about as clear eyed and
sober a work of political reason as you are ever likely to come across. It is
abundantly clear that The Prince, to use a modern phrase “was workshopped”
before making it to print with nearly 20 years passing between Machiavelli
writing it and a printed version making its appearance.
Machiavelli litters his
text with examples of how and how not to do things and the consequences of
actions. The example of how and why the French failed in Italy is contrasted
with both how the Romans succeeded in Greece and how the Greeks themselves were
able to hold the former Persian Empire even after the death of the charismatic
and militarily capable Alexander. These examples would have been known by
Machiavelli’s audience of rulers. The repeated advice “to exterminate a
defeated rulers family” at first seems quite blood thirsty. It ultimately
involves the murder of infants, but when thought about, makes a lot of sense
because it removes entirely any possible foci of rebellion by the subject
peoples and or ambitious nobles.
Machiavelli is matter-of-fact, clinical and utterly pragmatic. It is
little wonder that “The Prince” has gained such stature as a work of political
realism. I think that in a lot of ways it is the Wests version of Sun Tzu’s
“Art of War”, which overshadows Machiavelli’s own work of the same title and
was published before The Prince. The Prince was simply one work by a man who
spent most of his adult life occupied with the question of effective
governance, I found no less than fourteen other works by Machiavelli and the
vast majority of them are political in theme.
I especially liked chapter 5 in The Prince in which Machiavelli sums up
the differences between monarchies & republics:
But
when a city or country has been used to living under a prince, and his family
has been exterminated, the people won’t be able to choose from among themselves
a new prince to replace the old one; and having acquired the habit of obedience.
They won’t know how to live in freedom. So they’ll be slow to take up arms,
making it easier for an ·invading prince to win them over to his side.
Republics, on the other hand, have more vitality, more hatred, and a stronger
desire for revenge, which will never allow them to forget their former freedom;
so that the safest way is to destroy them or to go and live among them.
“The Prince” easily rates in the top 5 of influential works on political
theory, assuming that it doesn’t top the list. The list of people known to have
read and been influenced by “The Prince” reads as a “who’s who” of politics
since the Renaissance with: Cromwell, Charles V, the Medici family, the
founding Fathers of the US, Frederick the Great of Prussia, Napoleon, and
Mussolini, all being known to have read and possessed copies of The Prince.
Even the Mafia with the Godfathers John Gotti and Roy DeMeo have considered The
Prince essential reading.…but noticeably NOT Hitler or any other top Nazi’s
which came as a surprise given the political realism inherent in the quote from
Joseph Goebbels: "If you tell a lie
big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people
from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus
becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress
dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension,
the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” Which could just as easily
come from the pen of Machiavelli.
I’m buying my copy of The Portable Machiavelli tonight.
No comments:
Post a Comment